Category: Government

Construction, Government, New Residence

Home Builder Ramping Up but Still Facing City Headwinds

Leaders across Oregon want developers to build more homes. Governor Tina Kotek set a statewide housing production goal in 2023, aiming to add 36,000 units per year, and although that goal was not met, it remains a key talking point for the administration. Locally, past and present Portland City Council members, along with the Mayor, have tried to reorganize the City’s permitting structure and suspend specific fees to incentivize housing construction, which has declined post-pandemic. At a time when housing production targets and efforts to increase affordability would benefit from high-unit-count apartment construction within the Urban growth boundary, developers have reduced multifamily unit production, with outside investors choosing to build in other cities instead. Regional housing creators have likewise experienced diminished production, but recently, some Portland builders are finding a way to put crews back to work by reducing project unit counts to lessen permitting hurdles and bring in specialists who can navigate the convoluted City permitting process.

DK Homes owner Damir Karin began building Portland projects in 1991 and has remained a prolific housing developer in the region over the last 35 years. He points to the complex and opaque permitting process as the reason many of his projects have stalled over the past five years. However, he feels this is changing and anticipates a return to pre-pandemic levels of development for his company. Karin explained this change was not due to streamlined building code or reduced fees. Instead, he points to a new role within his company that focuses on breaking through the building permit bureaucracy while scaling down projects to get past “unexplained” rules that have caused years of delay. “What helped me is I hired a guy who just does permits for me, nothing else. He is running around, calling the City, and bothering them,” explained Karin.

An empty lot with a fallen tree and overgrown grass, surrounded by residential houses, under a cloudy sky.
380-foot-deep-by-80-foot-wide property at 2721 SE 101st Ave where DK Homes will build 8 new houses

Utilizing the added staff support for building permits, DK Homes intends to break ground in the next few months on three multi-unit developments in the Montavilla and surrounding areas, with a fourth from 2020 potentially reactivating as a smaller project. Karin appreciates the State and City efforts to make Middle Housing more enticing for housing producers. The Residential Infill Project (RIP), parts one and two, in effect since June 2022, added rules allowing many housing density options on parcels formerly restricted to single-family residences. It also ushered in Middle Housing Land Divisions within Single-Dwelling zones that allow houses to be on their own lots even if they are not directly connected to a city street, avoiding the need to create a condominium with homeowner fees. That has provided DK Homes with an avenue to convert its larger-unit projects into detached single-family homes that can sell for enough to cover the added expenses of holding high-interest-rate construction loans for a prolonged period and meeting the growing costs required by the City code.

DK Homes purchased a nearly three-quarter-acre property at 2721 SE 101st Avenue in 2017 with the intention of creating 11 homes. Now, the project will offer eight units off a shared driveway along the south edge of the property, with each house featuring a small garage, three bedrooms, two full bathrooms, and a half bath on the main level. “It was supposed to be 11, but going through the permit process and dealing with the City, fire code, this code, that code; they cut me to eight,” said Karin. “I want to do 11, but they cut to eight, I guess because of some fire rules.” He felt City staff never fully explained to him why the only way forward on this project was to offer less housing. Particularly because all homes on the 380-foot-deep-by-80-foot-wide property will have sprinkler systems to reduce the risk of fire spreading. Additionally, the driveway will extend to the back of the property in both designs. However, he is less interested in pushing against the rules and is instead trying to focus on moving these projects through the permitting process so he can start building again.

Aerial view of a residential neighborhood showing outlined properties with house numbers, streets, and green spaces.
Portland Maps aerial view of DK Homes project sites on SE 101st and 103rd Avenues near SE Clinton St

The delay in development on the SE 101st Avenue project allowed him to use a new form of land division introduced through the RIP updates called cottage clusters. This project will not be a condominium with a Home Owner Association (HOA). Each home will have its own lot. The driveway and utilities will cross the adjoining homes’ easement, allowing access to the buildings located in the center of the large block. “It’s going to be separate houses, average is 1,400 square feet each,” said Karin. “But they are counting the garage, so it is 1,200 plus 200 [square feet] for the garage.” Most of the projects DK Homes has underway in the area will include attached vehicle storage as part of the design. Karin acknowledges that garages take up space in the home’s footprint that could serve as living space, and says his approach may be “old-fashioned,” but he feels it better serves his customers. “The City is pushing for no garages. I think Portland is not ready for that; people still have cars, especially in that area. So I decided to do houses with a garage. The people can park their car or use it like a storage unit,” explained Karin.

DK Homes will start a similar project one block over on the southwest corner of SE 103rd Avenue and Clinton Street. Because that site is on a corner, three houses will face SE Clinton Street, each having a driveway connecting to the city street. The other three homes will use a shared driveway accessed from SE 103rd Avenue. The 14 new homes on SE 101st and 103rd Avenues will use the Homebuyer Opportunity Limited Tax Exemption (HOLTE) Program. That affordability program for Single-unit homes lets qualified buyers take a property tax exemption on structural improvements for up to 10 years, as long as the property and owner remain eligible per HOLTE Program requirements. This provision will limit homebuyers for these projects to those earning at or below 100% of the Median family income for a family of four in the area. That income cap can increase for larger households.

An empty lot with green and blue recycling bins, a mailbox, and a wooden sign, surrounded by trees and residential buildings in the background.
2719 SE 103rd Ave vacant lot where DK Homes will construct 6 homes

Whenever possible, DK Homes will preserve the original homes on the development site and add newer units within the undeveloped yard space. However, the lack of building during COVID and the slow recovery left its structures south of SE Division Street unoccupied, attracting squatters who damaged the homes significantly. Karin opted to demolish the nearly unrecoverable original homes and remove the incentive for people to trespass.

A residential house in Portland with a for sale sign in the front yard, surrounded by trees and a grassy area on a rainy day.
47 NE 87th Ave post renovation

The dangers of sitting empty did not impact DK Homes’ project on NE 87th Avenue. The team worked to preserve the interior of the 1909-era house at 47 NE 87th Avenue as much as possible and refinished the basement for added living space. Karin Split that property back into two distinct lots and is now selling the renovated century-old house. On the vacant lot at 43 NE 87th Avenue, DK Homes will create two attached homes. One of the common-wall homes will have four bedrooms with three and a half baths. It will have one bedroom on the ground floor with a full bathroom, making it suitable for multi-generational homebuyers or those with other accessibility needs. On the top floor are the other three bedrooms and two baths. The neighboring unit will have a similar layout without the lower-level bedroom and ensuite bathroom. They will both have attached garages with a split driveway running down the center of the property. A later land division will create separate properties for the new houses.

View of a residential construction site with a rocky pathway leading to a portable restroom, surrounded by trees and houses.
43 NE 87th Ave awaiting permit approval for two attached townhouses

This project, just off os East Burnside Street, is different than his other work south of the site. It is less focused on maximizing land and may not include affordability incentives. “I can go all the way to four [units on the property], but then you bring four families [on a smaller lot], and it’s gonna be a problem for neighbors,” remarked Karin. “I’m still trying to figure out all my costs to see if I will be able to build under the tax abatement.”

Intersection of SE Clinton Street and SE 103rd Avenue, featuring an empty lot surrounded by trees and nearby homes.
2719 SE 103rd Ave vacant lot where DK Homes will construct 6 homes

Damir Karin said that he feels the overlapping and contradictory building codes, along with infrastructure improvement requirements placed on housing creators, are driving up costs and incentivizing people to build for higher earners. “They’re talking about affordable housing and a shortage of space for people to live, but on the other hand, all the rules they bring up just hold back developers and make each project cost more. More requirements add more expenses,” explained Karin. “When we have to spend an additional hundred thousand to improve the sidewalk and curb or add a bioswale, somebody needs to pay. As a professional trying to make my living, if I spend $100,000, I have to somehow get some money back.” He points to years of changing requirements that have added to the cost of a detached home, and he feels it is even harder to make apartment projects profitable.

Rendering of a three-story multi-unit residential building featuring a driveway and parking area, surrounded by trees and landscaping, with pedestrians approaching the entrance.
2020 rendering of proposed 12-unit apartment building at 2444 SE 90th Ave provided by Concept Design & Associates

Karin points to his long-delayed apartment project at 2444 SE 90th Avenue as an example of one he could not get built in Portland. It started as a 12-unit apartment building with tuck-under parking. It faced delays and eventually became a smaller, five-unit project for sale rather than as a rental near a commercial corridor. “We have five attached townhomes, and my permit is in its fifth year with the City,” said Karin. After downsizing the unit count, the permits began moving forward. However, he said officials recently told him he will need to build a half-street improvement on the curbless section of SE 90th Avenue. He explained that this provision will require more engineering and further drive up costs, leading to fewer units at higher prices for future buyers.

Some builders are getting back to work as recent City programs have helped drive the creation of middle housing. Still, even a developer like Karin will point out that the number of projects underway is not the best measure of a successful housing policy. When the building permit process discourages apartment building density by adding costs and delaying project approval, builders will target lower-density land uses to get the project moving. He wants to build more housing units per property where it is appropriate, offering more affordable options for price-constrained buyers. He notes density is needed within Portland, recognizing that “no one is making more land,” but he needs the City to help builders like him navigate the system to deliver those projects. Not many local development companies can afford a dedicated person to shepherd projects through the permitting process, and they may still need to make unit-count concessions to gain approval.

People can expect to see work underway at the three DK Homes project sites in 2026.

Article and photos by

Jacob Loeb

Promotion: Check out East Portland News as it continues to advocate for and report on outer East Portland. You will find frequently updated articles and an archive of more than 5,000 stories written over the past 20+ years alongside a robust Community Calendar of events.

Government, Transportation

ODOT Program Subsidizes Apartment and Parking-lot EV Chargers

On November 6th, the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) opened its fourth round of the Community Charging Rebates (CCR) program, which subsidizes the cost of installing electric vehicle (EV) chargers for businesses, nonprofits, public entities, Tribes, EV service providers, and owners of multifamily home complexes. Large sections of Montavilla and East Portland reside within the project’s “Priority” area, and organizations that add to the charger network could receive $8,000 per Level 2 charge port installed or up to 80% of eligible expenses.

Three electric vehicle charging stations in a parking lot, with snow on the ground and signs indicating charging and parking regulations.
EV Chargers in the Portland Community College Southeast Campus parking lot

Oregon’s Department of Environmental Quality won a $197 million federal grant for its “Climate Equity and Resilience Through Action” program in 2024. From those funds, ODOT will disperse $10 million to support the installation of Level 2 vehicle chargers in priority communities by providing rebates to eligible public and private entities. Past versions of the charger program, launched in 2023, used state funds. Officials plan to fund future rounds of the program with combined state and federal money.

A Level 2 electric vehicle charging station installed in a parking structure, with a sign indicating electric vehicle parking only while charging.
EV Chargers in the Glisan Landing parking garage

The program aims to fill gaps in Oregon’s EV charging infrastructure by reducing the cost of installing charging stations in multifamily housing, public parking areas, and workplaces. People interested in the current funding round have until March 31st, 2026, to participate. However, the program reimburses eligible applicants on a first-come, first-served basis. Eligible projects can start the application process before they complete charging-station construction, as long as the unit is operational within 300 days. Otherwise, they could wait until work is complete and apply for a rebate within 90 days of installing an EV charging station.

Map showing priority and non-priority areas for EV charging installation in Oregon, with priority areas highlighted in blue.
ODOT Community Charging Rebates Program priority map showing Montavilla

Interested groups can visit ODOT’s Community Charging Rebates Program webpage or reach out to a Portland nonprofit partner, Forth, which is working with the Oregon transportation agency to provide technical assistance and support for applicants interested in installing EV charging on their property. Representatives from Forth are reachable at ODOTchargingrebates@forthmobility.org or (503) 724-8670. Residents in multifamily housing located within the priority area may want to contact building management to see if this program would incentivise building ownership to add a charger, and business owners with parking could also look into the feasibility of supporting EV charging for guests, as many area grocery stores have started offering in recent years.

Article and photos by

Jacob Loeb

Promotion: Montavilla News is supported by contributions from businesses like Otter Wax, a neighborhood producer of small-batch specialty goods handcrafted in Portland. Using only natural ingredients, they make modern care products that are steeped in tradition. We thank them for their support.

Government, Top 2025, Transportation

Traffic Citation Camera Equipment Returns to 82nd Ave

Crews recently replaced the speed and red-light enforcement cameras on 82nd Avenue after Portland City officials switched vendors this summer. The pole-mounted equipment appears inactive, with the Tuffak polycarbonate lens covers still donning its logoed protective film. However, drivers can anticipate the system’s activation, with a period of warning letters issued before the City switches to issuing citations for excessive speeds or failing to stop for a red traffic signal.

Nov 18, 2025, equipment installation on NE 82nd Ave facing E Burnside St (Weston Ruter)

Around the beginning of August 2025, crews working with the Portland Bureau of Transportation (PBOT) removed the newer intersection safety camera systems the City of Portland installed along 82nd Avenue the previous year. In summer 2024, crews installed new cameras along 82nd Avenue and in other areas of the City to deter speeding and running red lights in crash-prone areas. The camera system installed at 82nd Avenue at E Burnside Street monitored an intersection where a speeding vehicle killed an area resident in October 2023. Cameras at NE 82nd Avenue and Glisan Street monitored multiple directions of traffic where a driver hit and killed a wheelchair user in April 2023. The equipment removal was not an effort to reduce automated enforcement but instead supported a citywide effort to replace camera equipment with newer systems developed by NovoaGlobal, making that company the sole supplier and operator of the City’s speed and intersection safety camera program.

Left image shows original equipment on NE 82nd Ave near E Burnside St and then post removal condition (Jacob Loeb)

The City had 32 camera positions before the vendor switch, and the Portland Police Bureau operates two mobile Traffic Division speed enforcement vans that the City will also upgrade with NovoaGlobal equipment. For some City leaders, that is too few to reduce risky driving behavior adequately, and they advocate expanding the program. This summer, Portland City Councilor Steve Novick said in a KOIN News interview that he is interested in emulating other jurisdictions with fewer traffic fatalities per capita that have substantially more cameras in use. However, some residents oppose the automated cameras used in issuing citations. Objections voiced include concerns about excessive government surveillance, fining drivers instead of building infrastructure that encourages safety, and the inequitable distribution of cameras across the City that could penalize poorer communities.

NovoaGlobal equipment on NE 82nd Ave facing E Burnside St (Jacob Loeb)

The City will add three intersections to the safety camera network as part of the vendor switch-out work, increasing PBOT’s tools to support its goal of eliminating vehicular-related deaths and serious injuries on city streets. Those locations include southbound monitoring on NE 82nd Avenue at Fremont Street and northbound NE 82nd Avenue at Klickitat Street near Glenhaven Park and Leodis V. McDaniel High School. Other nearby network expansions will focus on SE Powell Boulevard.

PBOT notes that incidents involving speeds above posted limits are a top contributing factor to deadly crashes across the Portland region. Additionally, ignoring traffic signals causes a significant number of crashes. Some street safety advocates in favor of citation-based deterrents stress the importance of changing harmful road behavior through a variety of methods, including fines. Camera citations are not the only solution needed for safer streets. However, a majority of surveyed Portland residents support the expanded use of traffic cameras.

NovoaGlobal equipment on NE 82nd Ave facing NE Glisan St (Jacob Loeb)

Opponents of automated camera-based systems worry about privacy implications that could track drivers across Portland and the danger that city budgets will become dependent on fines, favoring revenue growth over correcting harmful behavior. Rules on camera placement and revenue use can limit the potential for misuse. PBOT’s website indicates that the program will only retain video footage not used in a citation for 30 days. Additionally, State law requires municipalities to spend the money collected from speeding tickets to cover the program’s costs or to pay for safety improvements and programs on the High Crash Network.

Drivers in Portland can expect to see up to 35 cameras operational by the end of 2025 if installation crews keep to schedule. Motorists should anticipate system activation at any time and travel cautiously.

by

Jacob Loeb

Correction: Updated to indicate Intersection safety cameras issue citations for speeding and red light running and removed yellow light running. PBOT notes that going through a yellow light in Oregon is a violation if you are able to stop prior to entering the intersection.

Promotion: Check out East Portland News as it continues to advocate for and report on outer East Portland. You will find frequently updated articles and an archive of more than 5,000 stories written over the past 20+ years alongside a robust Community Calendar of events.

Government

Portlanders Vote on Parks Levy

The November 4th Special Election ballot has just one question for Portland voters centered on renewing and increasing a five-year parks levy first approved in 2020. Measure 26-260 asks property taxpayers to renew the Portland Parks and Recreation (PP&R) supplemental funding source at $1.40 per $1,000 of assessed value from the previous 80 cents per $1,000. Portlanders tend to vote in favor of supporting parks. However, a recent Portland Auditor’s Office report casts doubt on the Parks Bureau’s fiscal management to date, raising concern among some about increasing park funding taxes without a sustainable budget plan.

A green park featuring trees, a paved walking path, and circular picnic tables surrounded by well-maintained grass.

The report outlines several issues driving PP&R’s budgetary shortfall, including unfunded pet projects from past City Council members and politicized management under the last form of government. However, the report identified the expansion of Portland’s Park system, including new locations and amenities, as a substantial fiscal burden for the Bureau. Building new parks without first securing a maintenance funding source exceeded PP&R’s share of the City’s General Fund, leaving the Parks Bureau with few options other than reducing services or closing locations.

Five years ago, during the pandemic, voters approved the parks levy to support services provided by PP&R after the Bureau cut costs during a 2019 $6 million shortfall. Those funds kept the parks’ programs open but did not address a substantial maintenance backlog. All the while, during its budgetary crunch, PP&R had a sizable source of money from developer fees. However, State and City laws prohibit the use of those funds for maintenance activities. That created a situation in which PP&R could add assets to the parks system without the funding to maintain them.

Sign for Gateway Green Park in Portland, indicating park hours and association with Portland Parks & Recreation.

Current District 3 Councilor Steve Novick also served previously on City Council under the Commissioner form of government during a pivotal time for parks, when its overbuilding phase ramped up due to City leadership’s increasing System Development Charges (SDCs) collected for parks from fees charged to development projects. His history with PP&R’s funding leads him to believe that Portlanders should approve 26-260 to give the current City Council time to rebalance park funding. “It would be rather absurd to take it as reason to vote against the levy because of what the auditor pointed out, which is true, we’ve been building new parks without the money to fix the old ones,” explained Novick.

Sign for Gateway Discovery Park in Portland, Oregon, with decorative sculpture and modern building in the background.

Councilor Novick believes the PP&R leadership has taken the blame for a systems failure that predates the 2019 budget shortfall. “Five years previously, in 2015, when I was on the council, we voted to increase parks SDCs; [Commissioner Dan] Saltzman and I voted no,” recalled Novick. They expressed concern about its impact on housing costs. A concern supported by the current City Council, which recently suspended SDCs temporarily on new residential projects. Novick noted that at the time, he was also concerned that PP&R would build facilities they could not maintain without additional funding that the former City Leadership did not provide. “The attitude of the council at the time was build baby build and don’t really worry about the crumbling assets.”

In Novick’s opinion, the current City Council can address PP&R funding in a more sustainable way, but needs to stabilize the decline before it starts making hard choices. “I think arguing that adopting the levy defers tough decisions is sort of fair, but we shouldn’t be making those tough decisions at the point of a gun in the context of having to come up with a budget that savages the parks system,” said Novick.

Three councilors seated at a table during a meeting, with nameplates indicating their names and positions.
Councilors Tiffany Koyama Lane, Angelita Morrillo, and Steve Novick representing District 3 in a March 2025 budget community listening session.

Conversations about park funding took center stage at City Hall during this last budget cycle, where PP&R competed for General Fund money alongside other large line items, such as police, fire, and homeless services. Some of the possibilities City leaders envision require changes to how the Bureau uses SDCs. “One thing that we’re going to do is go to the legislature and ask them to change the SDC statute so that SDCs can be used to repair existing structures, not just build new ones,” explained Novick. This change would allow PP&R to use development-fee-generated funds to maintain existing parks. This approach is favorable, as infill housing development brings more people into existing neighborhoods that may have languishing parks in need of attention to support new residents.

Another potential funding source comes from outside contributions. “I also think that there is a lot more thought now about trying to get some private money into the parks. The example that everybody always brings up is Central Park in New York City, [which is not funded by] City tax dollars. There’s a consortium of foundations and rich people to take care of Central Park,” said Novick. “I think that’s a conversation we need to have with our money elite in the city. Maybe there’s Nike branding or whatever all over the parks. Personally, I would live with that.”

A mural on the side of the Montavilla Community Center featuring colorful mosaic figures engaged in various physical activities, including sports and dance, with the center's name prominently displayed above.

Councilor Novick also noted that the city may need to issue a parks bond to address the backlog of repairs and reduce the operating expenses currently burdened by the system’s condition. “Hopefully, we can do the minor maintenance with this levy. That will prevent us getting to major maintenance costs in some facilities,” remarked Novick. He worries that without Ballot Measure 26-260, the City Council will have to make drastic cuts to parks without the time to plan spending reductions strategically. “What we learned [during the last City budget cycle] is that pretty much everything that parks does is really important to a bunch of people, and if the levy fails, then we’re gonna have to prepare a budget for next year which assumes we’re making massive cuts to parks.”

Ballot Measure 26-260 text says the median homeowner would pay $310 per year if the levy passes, which is just under $26 per month, and represents an $11 increase over what current property taxpayers have contributed to parks since the 2020 levy’s approval. Ballots are due by 8 p.m. on November 4th at a county drop site (multco.us/dropsites) or postmarked in the US mail system by November 4th.

Montavilla News does not endorse candidates or ballot measures.

Article and photos by

Jacob Loeb

Community, Government

Burn Ban Lifted in Time for Fall Fire Pits

On October 1st, Portland’s Fire Marshal lifted the citywide burn ban just in time for autumn outdoor recreation. The seasonal prohibition on recreational campfires, fire pits, and burning yard debris began on June 23rd; however, rules still permitted the use of outdoor grills, smokers, and similar cooking appliances. As Halloween approaches, and residents attempt to hold onto outdoor activities, more neighborhood gatherings center around the open flame for warmth and ambiance.

Although the Fire Marshal has lifted the burn ban, Portland Fire & Rescue’s leadership continues to ask people to follow fire safety rules. Residents should exercise extreme caution when using outdoor cooking devices or open flames and place them at least ten feet away from anything combustible, such as siding, fences, or shrubbery. People should only burn dried cordwood, keeping the flame shorter than 24 inches tall and contained in a raised fire pit or otherwise encircled. Officials also advise that Portlanders should have an extinguishing plan with an outstretched garden hose or filled water pails nearby, and never leave a fire or outdoor cooker unattended. Charcoal briquette ashes should be stored in a covered metal container away from combustibles after use, with residents keeping the ashes wet for a few days before disposing of them.

Many Portlanders find outdoor fires an essential part of their fall rituals. Still, for the safety of the community, people need to use caution, particularly as we adjust to drier seasons and shifting weather patterns. Individuals can contact Portland Fire & Rescue at 503-823-3700 for additional information about outdoor fire safety and rules.

Article and photo by

Jacob Loeb

Promotion: Check out East Portland News as it continues to advocate for and report on outer East Portland. You will find frequently updated articles and an archive of more than 5,000 stories written over the past 20+ years alongside a robust Community Calendar of events.

Community, Government, Services

JOIN Expanding Day Space Hours

At the end of September, the nonprofit JOIN expanded operating hours at its day center through a partnership with the City of Portland. For over a decade, the organization dedicated to transitioning individuals and families experiencing houselessness into stable housing has operated from 1435 NE 81st Avenue, a block behind NE 82nd Avenue near Interstate 84. With the addition of weekday hours and new weekend services starting October 4th, City officials believe this location can meet a critical need in the shelter system, as Mayor Keith Wilson expands efforts to end unsheltered homelessness in Portland.

JOIN says it serves 80 to 100 individuals and families weekly at its Montavilla Day Space, which previously opened from 11 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. With the new City partnership, they will greet guests from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. On Tuesdays and Thursdays, JOIN staff will open an hour later at 10 a.m. and close an hour earlier at 4 p.m., but still longer than pre-partnership operating hours. Starting in October, JOIN Day Space will open for the first time on weekends from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., filling an often missing gap in day center services.

Day centers are a critical component of the congregate shelter system, which does not provide dedicated individual facilities for people, unlike the recently opened sleeping pod sites in the area. JOIN’s Day Space, which they call “The House,” is a drop-in service center providing access to meals, restrooms, showers, laundry facilities, and hygiene products. People visiting regularly can also use it as a mailing address, a vital function for anyone trying to access supportive programs, reissue documents, or reconnect with people in their lives. The Day Space hosts weekly onsite medical services, providing a resource that can help reduce the use of the emergency medical system by unsheltered people. Additional services center around assistance with employment and addressing substance use disorder. Staff there can also provide support with navigating system resources, so willing families and individuals can work towards finding consistent shelter and eventually stable housing.

Exterior view of the JOIN Day Center with a colorful mural featuring a mountain and trees, a red structure in front, and seating area visible.
JOIN Day Space at 1435 NE 81st Avenue, Suite 100 (Jacob Loeb)

JOIN’s other work focuses on placing people with housing insecurities within stable housing. Their Primary Leasing work helps adults and families access private market units when they have significant barriers to housing by taking on responsibility for the rental through a direct relationship with the leasing company or property owner. They promote the Housing First approach, where they work to secure people in shelter and then continue to support them in addressing the issues that impact their ability to remain housed.

Day center placement can become polarizing within communities as some residents feel it attracts an outsized concentration of people with behavioral or substance use issues to their block. However, Day Centers provide a safe space for unsheltered Portlanders to care for themselves off the streets and in a facility where staff can offer support in making positive changes to their situation. In this instance, JOIN’s Day Space is well established in its location and is only expanding its operating hours. For people reliant on its services, this daily schedule should help people without consistent housing stay clean and safe during the daytime.

Article and photos by

Jacob Loeb

Community, Event, Government

82nd Ave Heat Islands Workshop July 22

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Oregon Metro, and partner organizations will host a community workshop focused on cooling down 82nd Avenue for the health and safety of its residents. The organizers invite people to pre-register for this free event on July 22nd from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. However, organizers are seeking youth participants, renters, and community members who are not often included in planning conversations to participate. The Dharma Rain Zen Center, located at 8500 NE Siskiyou Street, will host this Tuesday evening gathering. Attendees will receive food and beverages, but registration is required, and organizers explained that space is limited.

People familiar with 82nd Avenue understand how hot it is during the summer months, as the corridor exhibits a significant heat island effect, where pavement and other elements increase the temperature higher than surrounding areas. Workshop leaders believe that addressing this Portland urban heat zone requires governments to collaborate with the people who live and work in those areas to develop community-driven ideas for a cooler, healthier, and more interconnected 82nd Avenue.

Event flyer for a community workshop titled '82ND IS HOT' aimed at cooling down 82nd Avenue, featuring a date, time, location, contact information, and QR code for registration.

This workshop will connect attendees with federal, regional, and city government officials working alongside community advocacy groups, including Oregon Walks, the 82nd Avenue Coalition, and APANO. Transit provider TriMet is also a partner organization, as it is working to expand the FX Bus Rapid Transit system along 82nd Avenue with zero-emission buses powered by hydrogen, which emit less exhaust heat.

People interested in participating should register before the slots fill up and consider sharing the information with renters and youth who can contribute their unique perspectives to solutions to the harmful temperatures in the 82nd Avenue community.

By

Jacob Loeb

Disclosure: The author of this article serves on the 82nd Avenue Transit Project Community Advisory Committee (CAC) and the board of the 82nd Avenue Business Association which is a member organization of the 82nd Avenue Coalition.

Community, Government

Montavilla’s Best Off-leash Option to Avoid Fines

Many urban dogs and their humans do not have enough space at home to run free outdoors. For those Portland residents, city parks serve that recreational need. However, with only six out of Portland Park & Recreation’s 30 designated dog off-leash areas located east of 82nd Avenue, some area residents have ignored the rules requiring dogs to remain leashed in parks without off-leash areas. A new enforcement policy could curb that behavior by fining parkgoers $50 to $150 for bringing their off-leash dogs onto Portland Park property not designated for dog off-leash activity.

Map of Portland showing various designated dog off-leash areas marked by blue pins.
Portland Maps Image with six PP&R dog off-leash areas east of 82nd Ave and Mt. Tabor Park

Portland Park & Recreation (PP&R) Park Rangers received authorization to issue citations for dogs off-leash outside of designated areas in 2013. However, a policy requiring written warnings before issuing a citation complicated the enforcement process. In 2024, the City Council approved updates to the city code for park rules, which, in part, allow the park’s safety staff to issue fines for observed violations without written warning. A person receiving a citation must pay the fine within 30 calendar days or appeal the citation within 10 business days.

A fenced dog off-leash area in a forested park featuring several sections with grassy mounds, surrounded by trees.

PP&R says Park Rangers will work to educate visitors and gain voluntary compliance when confronted with park rule violations. However, they have the authority to require a person to leave a park for a set amount of time, along with issuing citations to visitors who violate dog-off-leash or scoop laws. Park Rangers patrol over 280 park properties across the City at all hours and respond to calls from park visitors and staff regarding concerns. PP&R first offered dog off-leash areas (DOLA) in 1995 as a way to support dog owners while maintaining parks as safe places for all users. Leashed dogs are allowed in nearly all of Portland’s parks and natural areas. The new citation policy is likely to encourage more people to follow the rules for bringing dogs into the park. However, those who have let their dogs run unleashed outside of designated park areas may now need to adjust what parks they use.

Entrance to a fenced dog off-leash area at Mt. Tabor Park, surrounded by trees and concrete blocks.
SE 68th Avenue DOLA entrance

For most Montavilla residents, the best off-leash dog recreation option is Mt. Tabor Park, which features a massive area with multiple entrance gates and diverse topography. PP&R recently completed a refresh of the Mt. Tabor DOLA, enhancing access and addressing concerns about erosion. Park users will still find fenced-off areas in the off-leash section, erected by maintenance staff, to allow plants to establish on the sloped hillside. However, these areas will offer people and pets a wide range of leash-free play options without the fear of receiving a fine. A new DOLA entrance, located at the end of SE 68th Avenue, off SE Division Street, is well placed for people with dogs arriving from east of Mt. Tabor Park.

Article and photos by

Jacob Loeb

Promotion: Montavilla News is supported by contributions from businesses like Otter Wax, a neighborhood producer of small-batch specialty goods handcrafted in Portland. Using only natural ingredients, they make modern care products that are steeped in tradition. We thank them for their support.

Community, Entertainment, Government

Budget Cuts Could Impact Montavilla Community Center

On Tuesday, March 18th, Portland residents will have an opportunity to participate in a District 3 budget listening session and express their community funding priorities to City leaders. Portland is facing a substantial budget shortfall for its fiscal year starting July 1st, and cuts are needed across City operations to balance spending against revenue. Within $16 million of recommended reductions to Portland Parks & Recreation’s budget are possible solutions that would impact Montavilla residents, including the loss of summer programs and the potential closure of the Community Center at 8219 NE Glisan Street.

From 6 to 8:30 p.m. on the 18th, members of the Portland City Council, Mayor Wilson, and representatives from the Budget Office will gather on the University of Western States campus at 8100 NE Tillamook Street to gauge community priorities regarding proposed budget cuts. People can also attend online via the Zoom conferencing app or passively watch on the City’s YouTube channel. Participants attending from the campus or via Zoom can provide two minutes of testimony. In-person speakers will register upon arrival, starting at 5:30 p.m. City staff will post virtual testimony instructions on the City’s website by Sunday, March 16th. Residents who will not attend the event or do not want to speak can submit written comments online via the City’s budget page.

Proposed budget cuts could impact a wide-ranging assortment of city services people have grown accustomed to receiving. In the recently posted Vibrant Communities – Decision Packages v2 budget document, two possible reduction proposals could impact Montavilla Park. One recommended reduction would close a community center, eliminating all current programs and services. The document does not identify which center would close, but the Montavilla Community Center is one of three examples given.

“This package would close a neighborhood community center, eliminating all programs and services currently provided to the community through this facility. Staff reductions will accompany this center closure, and recreation programs, including educational preschool and afterschool programs will no longer be offered. Events, rentals, and other recreational programming will also be eliminated at this location. Examples include, St Johns Community Center, Montavilla Community Center and Peninsula Park Community Center.” – Vibrant Communities – Decision Packages v2

In addition to the possible closure of Montavilla’s Community Center, the document includes recommendations for eliminating youth summer camp programs at ten locations in summer 2026. These reductions would include programs at Montavilla Community Center and the East Portland Community Center at 740 SE 106th Avenue, which is the next nearest parks resource center for people in the neighborhood.

“This budget package would result in the elimination of the youth summer camp program, currently provided at ten locations through five regional community centers (Southwest CC; East Portland CC; Charles Jordan CC; Matt Dishman CC; Mt Scott CC) and five neighborhood/specialty centers (St Johns CC; Peninsula Park CC; Woodstock CC; Montavilla CC; Multnomah Arts Center). Summer
2024 provided camps to 6,949 registered participants.” – Vibrant Communities – Decision Packages v2

These possible Parks department reductions are just two examples of proposed cuts to the City’s budget. People should review the proposed budget for more examples ahead of the listening session. Residents should note that these plans can adjust with community input, and no action is inevitable outside the need to close the City’s funding gap. Montavilla Community Center will close from March 17th to March 22nd for annual building maintenance. This short closure is unrelated to the budget deficit but previews how a possible Montavilla Community Center closure would impact the neighborhood. Organizers have three other listening sessions scheduled throughout Portland, including District 1 on March 20th, District 4 on April 1st, and District 2 on April 3rd.

Article and photos by

Jacob Loeb

Government

2025 City Council Leadership Elected

On January 2nd, Portland’s new 12-member City Council elected Councilor Elana Pirtle-Guiney from District 2 as the Council President and Councilor Tiffany Koyama Lane from District 3 as Vice President. The morning council session stretched into the afternoon as repeated votes failed to yield a majority for any one Council President candidate. What originally started as a tie vote between Councilor Candace Avalos of East Portland’s District 1 and Councilor Olivia Clark of Downtown’s District 4 delivered more centrally location leadership. After today’s vote, City Council leadership will reside with representatives from North-Northeast and Southeast Portland.

The hours-long election for Council President was in contrast to the swift election of Councilor Koyama Lane for Vice President. She ran unopposed for the position and had broad support. Early in the voting process, Councilor Loretta Smith pushed for new Mayor Keith Wilson to provide the tie-breaking vote against the advice of Portland’s City Attorney. Fellow Councilors disagreed with that path forward, and the group put in hours of discussion and voting to end up with a seven to five vote in favor of Councilor Pirtle-Guiney against Councilor Avalos.

Anyone looking for an indication of how the new 12-member City Council will function in the coming year has hours of deliberation to review while forming that opinion. However, the group of electeds left the proceedings with supportive and congratulatory words for each other, and this early test of the system yielded the results that many Portland voters envisioned for this new form of City government. The representatives worked for their District’s position and the city as a whole, resulting in a compromise that moves the work forward.

By

Jacob Loeb